Difference between revisions of "Photolysis mechanism"

From Geos-chem
Jump to: navigation, search
(O1D reaction updated to JPL 2006)
(Cloud overlap options in FAST-J)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
GEOS-Chem now has 3 cloud overlap options in the FAST-J photolysis mechanism:
 
GEOS-Chem now has 3 cloud overlap options in the FAST-J photolysis mechanism:
  
:1. '''Linear cloud overlap assumption:''' This is the default in GEOS-Chem versions [[GEOS-Chem_versions_under_development#v8-01-01|v8-01-01]] and prior.  The option is:
+
=== Linear cloud overlap assumption ===  
 +
 
 +
The linear cloud overlap option is the default in GEOS-Chem versions [[GEOS-Chem_versions_under_development#v8-01-01|v8-01-01]] and prior.  The option is:
  
 
     Grid Box Optical depth = In-cloud optical depth * Cloud fraction.   
 
     Grid Box Optical depth = In-cloud optical depth * Cloud fraction.   
  
:2. '''Approximate random overlap assumption:''' This option will be introduced into the standard code in GEOS-Chem v8-01-02 (benchmark run #1).
+
=== Approximate random overlap assumption ===  
 +
 
 +
This approximate random overlap option will be introduced into the standard code in GEOS-Chem v8-01-02 (benchmark run #1).
  
 
     Grid Box Optical Depth = In-Cloud Optical Depth * ( Cloud Fraction )^1.5  
 
     Grid Box Optical Depth = In-Cloud Optical Depth * ( Cloud Fraction )^1.5  
  
:3. '''Maximum random overlap assumption:'''  This option is much more computationally intensive, and therefore is not used as the default option.  However, if you wish to use this option, then manually edit the <tt>fast_j.f</tt> source code file such that <tt>OVERLAP = 3</tt>.   
+
=== Maximum random overlap assumption ===
 +
 
 +
This maximum random overlap option is much more computationally intensive, and therefore is not used as the default option.  However, if you wish to use this option, then manually edit the <tt>fast_j.f</tt> source code file such that <tt>OVERLAP = 3</tt>.   
  
:The Maximum-Random Overlap (MRAN) scheme assumes that clouds in adjacent layers are maximally overlapped to form a cloud block and that blocks of clouds separated by clear layers are randomly overlapped.  A vertical profile of fractional cloudiness is converted into a series of column configurations with corresponding fractions see Liu et al., JGR 2006; hyl,3/3/04).  
+
The Maximum-Random Overlap (MRAN) scheme assumes that clouds in adjacent layers are maximally overlapped to form a cloud block and that blocks of clouds separated by clear layers are randomly overlapped.  A vertical profile of fractional cloudiness is converted into a series of column configurations with corresponding fractions see Liu et al., JGR 2006; hyl,3/3/04).  
  
:For more details about cloud overlap assumptions and their effect on photolysis frequencies and key oxidants in the troposphere, refer to the following articles:
+
For more details about cloud overlap assumptions and their effect on photolysis frequencies and key oxidants in the troposphere, refer to the following articles:
  
:#Liu, H., et al., ''Radiative effect of clouds on tropospheric chemistry in a global three-dimensional  chemical transport model'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''111''', D20303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006403, 2006.
+
#Liu, H., et al., ''Radiative effect of clouds on tropospheric chemistry in a global three-dimensional  chemical transport model'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''111''', D20303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006403, 2006.
:#Tie, X., et al., ''Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108'''(D20), 4642, doi:10.1029/2003JD003659, 2003.
+
#Tie, X., et al., ''Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108'''(D20), 4642, doi:10.1029/2003JD003659, 2003.
:#Feng, Y., et al., ''Effects of cloud overlap in photochemical models'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''109''', D04310, doi:10.1029/2003JD004040, 2004.
+
#Feng, Y., et al., ''Effects of cloud overlap in photochemical models'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''109''', D04310, doi:10.1029/2003JD004040, 2004.
:#Stubenrauch, C.J., et al., ''Implementation of subgrid cloud vertical structure inside a GCM and its effect on the radiation budget'', <u>J. Clim.</u>, '''10''', 273-287, 1997.
+
#Stubenrauch, C.J., et al., ''Implementation of subgrid cloud vertical structure inside a GCM and its effect on the radiation budget'', <u>J. Clim.</u>, '''10''', 273-287, 1997.
  
 
For more information, please contact Hongyu Liu (hyl@nianet.org).
 
For more information, please contact Hongyu Liu (hyl@nianet.org).
  
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 12:35, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
+
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 12:44, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:44, 23 May 2008

This page describes some of the updates to the FAST-J photolysis mechanism, as is currently implemented in GEOS-Chem.

Input files for FAST-J

The following input files are required for the FAST-J photolysis mechanism:

ratj.d
This file is where you specify each of the FAST-J photolysis species. Each species is mapped to a corresponding entry of the GEOS-Chem chemical mechanism.
jv_atms.dat
This file specifies the reference O3 climatology for FAST-J. NOTE: GEOS-Chem will overwrite this reference climatology with TOMS/SBUV data for those months and locations where such data exists.
jv_spec.dat
This file is where the various quantum yields and aerosol cross-sections are specified.

O1D reaction updated to JPL 2006

As of GEOS-Chem v8-01-02, the rate constants in the "FAST-J" jv_atms.dat file have been updated by Lin Zhang.

These were the old values:

O3_1d  180 9.500E-01 9.330E-01 4.270E-01 6.930E-02 6.060E-02       0.0       0.0
O3_1d  260 9.500E-01 9.420E-01 4.890E-01 1.360E-01 7.110E-02       0.0       0.0
O3_1d  300 9.500E-01 9.550E-01 5.870E-01 2.370E-01 8.570E-02       0.0       0.0

which are now replaced by the new values from JPL 2006:

O3_1d  180 9.000E-01 9.000E-01 3.824E-01 8.092E-02 7.650E-02       0.0       0.0
O3_1d  260 9.000E-01 9.000E-01 4.531E-01 1.438E-01 7.654E-02       0.0       0.0
O3_1d  300 9.000E-01 9.000E-01 5.273E-01 2.395E-01 7.659E-02       0.0       0.0

For more information, please contact Lin Zhang (lzh@io.as.harvard.edu).

--Bob Y. 11:16, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Cloud overlap options in FAST-J

GEOS-Chem now has 3 cloud overlap options in the FAST-J photolysis mechanism:

Linear cloud overlap assumption

The linear cloud overlap option is the default in GEOS-Chem versions v8-01-01 and prior. The option is:

    Grid Box Optical depth = In-cloud optical depth * Cloud fraction.  

Approximate random overlap assumption

This approximate random overlap option will be introduced into the standard code in GEOS-Chem v8-01-02 (benchmark run #1).

    Grid Box Optical Depth = In-Cloud Optical Depth * ( Cloud Fraction )^1.5 

Maximum random overlap assumption

This maximum random overlap option is much more computationally intensive, and therefore is not used as the default option. However, if you wish to use this option, then manually edit the fast_j.f source code file such that OVERLAP = 3.

The Maximum-Random Overlap (MRAN) scheme assumes that clouds in adjacent layers are maximally overlapped to form a cloud block and that blocks of clouds separated by clear layers are randomly overlapped. A vertical profile of fractional cloudiness is converted into a series of column configurations with corresponding fractions see Liu et al., JGR 2006; hyl,3/3/04).

For more details about cloud overlap assumptions and their effect on photolysis frequencies and key oxidants in the troposphere, refer to the following articles:

  1. Liu, H., et al., Radiative effect of clouds on tropospheric chemistry in a global three-dimensional chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006403, 2006.
  2. Tie, X., et al., Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D20), 4642, doi:10.1029/2003JD003659, 2003.
  3. Feng, Y., et al., Effects of cloud overlap in photochemical models, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D04310, doi:10.1029/2003JD004040, 2004.
  4. Stubenrauch, C.J., et al., Implementation of subgrid cloud vertical structure inside a GCM and its effect on the radiation budget, J. Clim., 10, 273-287, 1997.

For more information, please contact Hongyu Liu (hyl@nianet.org).

--Bob Y. 12:44, 23 May 2008 (EDT)