Difference between revisions of "CO2 simulation"

From Geos-chem
Jump to: navigation, search
(CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation user groups)
 
(107 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
__FORCETOC__
 +
'''''[[CH4 simulation|Previous]] | [[Mercury|Next]] | [[Guide to GEOS-Chem simulations]]'''''
 +
#[[GEOS-Chem chemistry mechanisms|Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms]]
 +
#[[Aerosol-only simulation]]
 +
#[[CH4 simulation]]
 +
#<span style="color:blue">'''CO2 simulation'''</span>
 +
#[[Mercury|Hg simulation]]
 +
#[[POPs simulation]]
 +
#[[Tagged CO simulation]]
 +
#[[Tagged O3 simulation]]
 +
#[[TransportTracers simulation]]
 +
 +
 
This page contains information about the carbon dioxide (CO<span><sub>2</sub>) simulation in GEOS-Chem.
 
This page contains information about the carbon dioxide (CO<span><sub>2</sub>) simulation in GEOS-Chem.
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
  
The original GEOS-Chem CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation was developed by Parv Suntharalingam (Suntharalingam et al., 2003; 2004), now at the University of East Anglia.  A major update to the CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation has been developed by Ray Nassar and Dylan B.A. Jones of the University of Toronto (Nassar et al., 2010).  This update was delivered to the GEOS-Chem software development team at Harvard on 2010 April 1.'''''
+
The original GEOS-Chem CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation was developed by Parv Suntharalingam (Suntharalingam et al., 2003; 2004), now at the University of East Anglia.  A major update to the CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation was completed in 2010 by Ray Nassar and Dylan B.A. Jones of the University of Toronto (Nassar et al., 2010).  The latest update to the CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation was developed by Ray Nassar (now at Environment Canada) and appears in GEOS-Chem v10-01, which was released on 2015 May 1.'''''
  
The update retains the original six CO<span><sub>2</sub> fluxes: fossil fuel, ocean exchange, biomass burning, biofuel burning, balanced terrestrial exchange (CASA) and net annual terrestrial exchange.  New inventories are available as options for some of these fluxes and other new fluxes have been added such as CO<span><sub>2</sub> emissions from international shipping and aviation. There is also now an optional feature to include CO<span><sub>2</sub> production from the oxidation of CO, CH<span><sub>4</sub> and NMVOCs. This chemical source concept was first highlighted by Enting and Mansbridge (1991). Although a few attempts have been made by other groups in the past, this implementation will make GEOS-Chem the only 3-D global model in current use to account for the chemical production of CO<span><sub>2</sub>.  The GEOS-Chem implementation uses an approach similar to that described in Suntharalingam et al. (2005), with some updated year-specific numbers and some other modifications described in Nassar et al. (2010).
+
== CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation user groups ==
  
The full GEOS-Chem CO<span><sub>2</sub> update was applied to v8-02-01 (along with some patches). It is now undergoing testing and should be publicly available in the next GEOS-Chem release (v8-03-02).  The model update will be accompanied by an update to the GEOS-Chem online manual. The references below are cited in the updated code's comments and online manual.
+
See [[Carbon_Cycle_Working_Group#Current_Carbon_Cycle_Projects_.28please_add_yours.21.29|this post on the ''Carbon Cycle Working Group'' wiki page]].
 
+
=== Authors and collaborators ===
+
* [mailto:ray.nassar@ec.gc.ca Ray Nassar]  ''(Environment Canada and U. Toronto)''
+
* [mailto:P.Suntharalingam@uea.ac.uk Parvada Suntharalingam] ''(U. East Anglia)''
+
 
+
=== CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation user groups ===
+
 
+
{| border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=5
+
|- bgcolor="#cccccc"
+
!User Group
+
!Personnel
+
!Projects
+
|-valign="top"
+
|[http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/~jones/ University of Toronto]
+
|[mailto:ray.nassar@ec.gc.ca Ray Nassar]
+
| Model updates and application to inverse modeling
+
|-valign="top"
+
|Korea Environment Institute (KEI)]
+
|[mailto:cshim@kei.re.kr Changsub Shim]
+
|
+
|-valign="top"
+
|[http://spot.colorado.edu/~henzed/index.html University of Colorado Boulder]
+
|[mailto:daven.henze@colorado.edu Daven Henze]
+
| CO2 adjoint
+
|-valign="top"
+
|Add yours here!
+
|
+
|
+
|}
+
 
+
== Validation ==
+
 
+
The updated CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation will be incorporated into GEOS-Chem v8-03-02. In Nassar et al. (2010) model comparisons are made with GLOBALVEIW-CO2 (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/globalview/co2/co2_intro.html) and CONTRAIL (Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner) measurements.  In other work, the CO<span><sub>2</sub> simulation has also been compared with aircraft observations from the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) campaigns of 2009.
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
#Andres, R. J., G. Marland, I. Fung, and E. Matthews, ''A 1&deg;x1&deg; distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''10''', 419–429, 1996.
 
#Andres, R. J., G. Marland, I. Fung, and E. Matthews, ''A 1&deg;x1&deg; distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''10''', 419–429, 1996.
 +
#Andres, R. J., Gregg, J. S., Losey, L., Marland, G., and Boden, T. A.: ''Monthly, global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption'',  <u>Tellus B</u>, 63B, 2011.
 
#Baker, D. F., et al., ''TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO<span><sub>2</sub> fluxes, 1988-2003'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''20''', GB1002, doi:10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006.
 
#Baker, D. F., et al., ''TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO<span><sub>2</sub> fluxes, 1988-2003'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''20''', GB1002, doi:10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006.
 
#Boden, T.A., G. Marland, and R.J. Andres, ''Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO<span><sub>2</sub> Emissions''. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001, 2009.
 
#Boden, T.A., G. Marland, and R.J. Andres, ''Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO<span><sub>2</sub> Emissions''. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001, 2009.
 
#Corbett & Koehler, ''Updated emissions from ocean shipping'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108''', D20, 4650, 2003.
 
#Corbett & Koehler, ''Updated emissions from ocean shipping'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108''', D20, 4650, 2003.
#Corbett, J. J., and H. W. Koehler, ''Considering alternative input parameters in an activity-based ship fuel consumption and emissions model'': Reply to comment by Øyvind Endresen et al. on ''Updated emissions from ocean shipping'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, 109, 2004.
+
#Corbett, J. J., and H. W. Koehler, ''Considering alternative input parameters in an activity-based ship fuel consumption and emissions model'': Reply to comment by Øyvind Endresen et al. on ''Updated emissions from ocean shipping'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''109''', 2004.
 
#Duncan, B. N., R. V. Martin, A. C. Staudt, R. Yevich, and J. A. Logan, ''Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108'''(D2), 4100, doi:10.1029/2002JD002378, 2003.
 
#Duncan, B. N., R. V. Martin, A. C. Staudt, R. Yevich, and J. A. Logan, ''Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''108'''(D2), 4100, doi:10.1029/2002JD002378, 2003.
 
#Endresen, O, et al., ''A historical reconstruction of ships fuel consumption and emissions'', <u>J. Geophys. Res</u>, '''112''', D12301, 2007.
 
#Endresen, O, et al., ''A historical reconstruction of ships fuel consumption and emissions'', <u>J. Geophys. Res</u>, '''112''', D12301, 2007.
Line 55: Line 36:
 
#Kim, B. Y., et al., ''System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Part 1: Model description and inventory results'', <u>Transportation Research</u>, Part D 12, 325–346, 2007.
 
#Kim, B. Y., et al., ''System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Part 1: Model description and inventory results'', <u>Transportation Research</u>, Part D 12, 325–346, 2007.
 
#Le Quere, C. et al., ''Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide'', <u>Nature Geoscience</u>, doi:10.1038/ngeo689, 2009.
 
#Le Quere, C. et al., ''Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide'', <u>Nature Geoscience</u>, doi:10.1038/ngeo689, 2009.
#Nassar, R., D. B. A. Jones, P. Suntharalingam, J. M. Chen, R. J. Andres, K. J. Wecht, R. M. Yantosca, S. S. Kualwik, K. W. Bowman, J. R. Worden, T. Machida, H. Matsueda, ''Modeling global atmospheric CO<span><sub>2</sub> with improved emission inventories and CO<span><sub>2</sub> production from the oxidation of other carbon species, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions'', accepted, 2010.
+
#Nassar, R., D. B. A. Jones, P. Suntharalingam, J. M. Chen, R. J. Andres, K. J. Wecht, R. M. Yantosca, S. S. Kualwik, K. W. Bowman, J. R. Worden, T. Machida, H. Matsueda, ''Modeling global atmospheric CO<span><sub>2</sub> with improved emission inventories and CO<span><sub>2</sub> production from the oxidation of other carbon species, Geoscientific Model Development'', 3, 689-716, 2010.
 
#Olsen, S. C., and J. T. Randerson, ''Differences between surface and column atmospheric CO<span><sub>2</sub> and implications for carbon cycle research'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''109''', D02301, doi:10.1029/2003JD003968, 2004.
 
#Olsen, S. C., and J. T. Randerson, ''Differences between surface and column atmospheric CO<span><sub>2</sub> and implications for carbon cycle research'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''109''', D02301, doi:10.1029/2003JD003968, 2004.
 
#Potter, C. S., J. T. Randerson, C. B. Field, P. A. Matson, P. M. Vitousek, H. A. Mooney, and S. A. Klooster, ''Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, 7, 811–841, 1993.
 
#Potter, C. S., J. T. Randerson, C. B. Field, P. A. Matson, P. M. Vitousek, H. A. Mooney, and S. A. Klooster, ''Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, 7, 811–841, 1993.
Line 66: Line 47:
 
#Wang, C., J.J. Corbett, J. Firestone, ''Modeling Energy Use and Emissions from North American Shipping: Application of the Ship Traffic, Energy, and Environment Model'', <u>Environ. Sci. Technol.</u>, '''41''', 3226-3232, 2008.
 
#Wang, C., J.J. Corbett, J. Firestone, ''Modeling Energy Use and Emissions from North American Shipping: Application of the Ship Traffic, Energy, and Environment Model'', <u>Environ. Sci. Technol.</u>, '''41''', 3226-3232, 2008.
 
#Wilkersen, J.T. et al., ''Analysis of emission data from global commercial Aviation: 2004 and 2006'', <u>Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc.</u>, '''10''', 2945-2983, 2010.
 
#Wilkersen, J.T. et al., ''Analysis of emission data from global commercial Aviation: 2004 and 2006'', <u>Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc.</u>, '''10''', 2945-2983, 2010.
 +
#Wofsy, S.C., et al., HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): Fine grained, global scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols, <u>Proceedings of the Royal Society A</u>, '''369''', 2073-2086, 2011.
 
#Yevich, R., and J. A. Logan, ''An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''17'''(4), 1095, doi:10.1029/2002GB001952, 2003. [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/publications/yevich2003.pdf PDF]
 
#Yevich, R., and J. A. Logan, ''An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world'', <u>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</u>, '''17'''(4), 1095, doi:10.1029/2002GB001952, 2003. [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/publications/yevich2003.pdf PDF]
 
== Known issues ==
 
 
Although GEOS-Chem v8-03-02 will be released with the functionality to run with monthly fossil fuel CO<span><sub>2</sub> emissions from CDIAC (R.J. Andres), the inventory files most likely will not be released until a later date, when the submitted paper Andres et al. (2010) is at a sufficient stage.  Until then, annually-averaged fossil fuel CO<span><sub>2</sub> emissions must be selected in the input.geos file.
 
 
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 12:26, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
 
 
--[[User:Ray|Ray Nassar]] 9:48, 25 June 2010 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 14:44, 18 October 2023

Previous | Next | Guide to GEOS-Chem simulations

  1. Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms
  2. Aerosol-only simulation
  3. CH4 simulation
  4. CO2 simulation
  5. Hg simulation
  6. POPs simulation
  7. Tagged CO simulation
  8. Tagged O3 simulation
  9. TransportTracers simulation


This page contains information about the carbon dioxide (CO2) simulation in GEOS-Chem.

Overview

The original GEOS-Chem CO2 simulation was developed by Parv Suntharalingam (Suntharalingam et al., 2003; 2004), now at the University of East Anglia. A major update to the CO2 simulation was completed in 2010 by Ray Nassar and Dylan B.A. Jones of the University of Toronto (Nassar et al., 2010). The latest update to the CO2 simulation was developed by Ray Nassar (now at Environment Canada) and appears in GEOS-Chem v10-01, which was released on 2015 May 1.

CO2 simulation user groups

See this post on the Carbon Cycle Working Group wiki page.

References

  1. Andres, R. J., G. Marland, I. Fung, and E. Matthews, A 1°x1° distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 10, 419–429, 1996.
  2. Andres, R. J., Gregg, J. S., Losey, L., Marland, G., and Boden, T. A.: Monthly, global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption, Tellus B, 63B, 2011.
  3. Baker, D. F., et al., TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988-2003, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 20, GB1002, doi:10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006.
  4. Boden, T.A., G. Marland, and R.J. Andres, Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001, 2009.
  5. Corbett & Koehler, Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J. Geophys. Res., 108, D20, 4650, 2003.
  6. Corbett, J. J., and H. W. Koehler, Considering alternative input parameters in an activity-based ship fuel consumption and emissions model: Reply to comment by Øyvind Endresen et al. on Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J. Geophys. Res., 109, 2004.
  7. Duncan, B. N., R. V. Martin, A. C. Staudt, R. Yevich, and J. A. Logan, Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 4100, doi:10.1029/2002JD002378, 2003.
  8. Endresen, O, et al., A historical reconstruction of ships fuel consumption and emissions, J. Geophys. Res, 112, D12301, 2007.
  9. Enting, I. G. and Mansbridge, J. V.: Latitudinal distribution of sources and sinks of CO2: results of and inversion study, Tellus B, 43, 156–170, 1991.
  10. Kim, B. Y., et al., System for assessing Aviation's Global Emissions (SAGE) Version 1.5 global Aviation Emissions Inventories for 2000-2004, 2005.
  11. Kim, B. Y., et al., System for assessing Aviation’s Global Emissions (SAGE), Part 1: Model description and inventory results, Transportation Research, Part D 12, 325–346, 2007.
  12. Le Quere, C. et al., Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, Nature Geoscience, doi:10.1038/ngeo689, 2009.
  13. Nassar, R., D. B. A. Jones, P. Suntharalingam, J. M. Chen, R. J. Andres, K. J. Wecht, R. M. Yantosca, S. S. Kualwik, K. W. Bowman, J. R. Worden, T. Machida, H. Matsueda, Modeling global atmospheric CO2 with improved emission inventories and CO2 production from the oxidation of other carbon species, Geoscientific Model Development, 3, 689-716, 2010.
  14. Olsen, S. C., and J. T. Randerson, Differences between surface and column atmospheric CO2 and implications for carbon cycle research, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02301, doi:10.1029/2003JD003968, 2004.
  15. Potter, C. S., J. T. Randerson, C. B. Field, P. A. Matson, P. M. Vitousek, H. A. Mooney, and S. A. Klooster, Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 7, 811–841, 1993.
  16. Sausen, R. and U. Schumann, Estimates of the Climate Response to Aircraft CO2 and NOx Emissions Scenarios, Climate Change, 44: 27-58, 2000.
  17. Suntharalingam, P., C. M. Spivakovsky, J. A. Logan, and M. B. McElroy, Estimating the distribution of terrestrial CO2 sources and sinks from atmospheric measurements: Sensitivity to configuration of the observation network, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D15), 4452, doi:10.1029/2002JD002207, 2003.
  18. Suntharalingam, P., D. J. Jacob, P. I. Palmer, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yantosca, Y. Xiao, M. J. Evans, D. G. Streets, S. L. Vay, and G. W. Sachse, Improved quantification of Chinese carbon fluxes using CO2/CO correlations in Asian outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D18S18, doi:10.1029/2003JD004362, 2004.
  19. Suntharalingam, P., J. T. Randerson, N. Krakauer, J. A. Logan, and D. J. Jacob, Influence of reduced carbon emissions and oxidation on the distribution of atmospheric CO2: Implications for inversion analyses, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB4003, doi:10.1029/2005GB002466, 2005.
  20. Takahashi, T., R. A. Feely, R. Weiss, R. H. Wanninkhof, D. W. Chipman, S. C. Sutherland, T. T. Takahashi, Global air-sea flux of CO2: an estimate based on measurements of sea-air pCO2 difference, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 94, 8292–8299, 1997.
  21. Takahashi, T., et al., Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. II, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009, 2009.
  22. Wang, C., J.J. Corbett, J. Firestone, Modeling Energy Use and Emissions from North American Shipping: Application of the Ship Traffic, Energy, and Environment Model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3226-3232, 2008.
  23. Wilkersen, J.T. et al., Analysis of emission data from global commercial Aviation: 2004 and 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc., 10, 2945-2983, 2010.
  24. Wofsy, S.C., et al., HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): Fine grained, global scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 369, 2073-2086, 2011.
  25. Yevich, R., and J. A. Logan, An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 17(4), 1095, doi:10.1029/2002GB001952, 2003. PDF