Difference between revisions of "Biomass burning emissions"

From Geos-chem
Jump to: navigation, search
(FINNv1)
(update FIRECAM details)
(40 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This page describes the options for biomass burning emissions in GEOS-Chem.
 
This page describes the options for biomass burning emissions in GEOS-Chem.
  
== GFED3 ==
+
== GFED4 ==
  
Please see our [[GFED3 biomass burning emissions]] wiki page for a complete description of the GFED3 emissions product.
+
The [[GFED4 biomass burning emissions|GFED4 biomass burning emission inventory]] is now the current default biomass burning dataset for GEOS-Chem (introduced in [[GEOS-Chem v10-01|v10-01]], June 2015).  The current GFED4 archive contains data from 1997 through 2016.
  
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 15:25, 13 February 2015 (EST)
+
GFED4 has since superseded the obsolete [[GFED3 biomass burning emissions|GFED3]] and [[GFED2 biomass burning emissions|GFED2]] inventories.
  
 +
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Yantosca]] ([[User talk:Bmy|talk]]) 19:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
  
 +
== FINNv1 ==
  
== GFED2 ==
+
The [[FINNv1 biomass burning emissions|FINNv1 biomass burning emission inventory]] has been added to [[GEOS-Chem v10-01]] via the [[HEMCO|HEMCO emissions component]]. This inventory may be used to replace [[GFED4 biomass burning emissions|GFED4]] for research purposes.
  
The [[GFED2 biomass burning emissions]] are obsolete and have been superseded by [[GFED3 biomass burning emissions|GFED3]]
+
--[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Sulprizio]] 10:21, 18 February 2015 (EST)
  
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 15:30, 13 February 2015 (EST)
+
== QFED ==
  
== FLAMBE biomass emissions ==
+
The [[QFED_biomass_burning_emissions|QFED biomass burning emission inventory]] has been added to [[GEOS-Chem v10-01]] via the [[HEMCO|HEMCO emissions component]]. This inventory may be used to replace [[GFED4 biomass burning emissions|GFED4]] for research purposes.
  
<div style="color: #aa0000; background: #eeeeee;border: 3px solid red; padding: 1em; margin: auto; width: 90%; ">'''<p>NOTE: At this time FLAMBE has not been implemented into the mainline standard GEOS-Chem, but it has been used for the NRT-ARCTAS codes.  Therefore probably only a small fraction of GEOS-Chem users will be concerned with these emissions at this time. (Bob Yantosca, 13 May 2014)</p>'''</div>
+
--[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Sulprizio]] ([[User talk:Melissa Payer|talk]]) 18:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  
=== Data issues ===
+
== GFAS ==
  
'''''[mailto:jafisher@fas.harvard.edu Jenny Fisher] wrote:'''''
+
The [[GFAS biomass burning emissions|GFAS biomass burning emission inventory]] was added in [[GEOS-Chem 12#12.2.0|GEOS-Chem 12.2.0]] via the [[HEMCO|HEMCO emissions component]]. This inventory may be used to replace [[GFED4 biomass burning emissions|GFED4]] for research purposes.
  
:Sorry to revisit the old FLAMBE issues, but we are seeing some strange results in the fire emissions, and I am trying to verify with Ed Hyer that we are processing the data correctly.
+
--[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Sulprizio]] ([[User talk:Melissa Payer|talk]]) 12:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  
:To get a handle on how we are processing the file, I have been looking in Philippe's directory <tt>~phs/IDL/dvpt/flambe/</tt>
+
== FIRECAM tool ==
  
:I took a look at some of the data files in the data/ directory in there. In the column that corresponds to carbon emissions (column 11, or 10 in IDL accounting), I see values that range from 4.95e4 to 765e4. Hyer tells me that in his version of the files, these range from 4.95 to 7650 (i.e. 4 orders of magnitude different). We are assuming these emissions are in g/m2, which they clearly aren't at our values.
+
I developed the [https://globalfires.earthengine.app/view/firecam FIRECAM tool] for end-users to quickly compare fire emissions estimates from five global inventories (GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2, FINNv1.5, QFEDv2.5r1, and FEERv1.0-G1.2) for a given study region. Currently, FIRECAM supports six species: CO2, CO, CH4, OC, BC, and PM2.5. FIRECAM compares the five inventories at an aggregated 0.5deg x 0.5deg spatial resolution for the 2003-2018 time period. Please see the [https://sites.google.com/view/firecam/home FIRECAM website] and [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111557 our paper] for more information. The paper describes the methodological differences among these inventories and metrics we developed to diagnose spatial biases and uncertainties. We recommend end-users to use multiple inventories in model runs, if possible. As we show in our paper, the choice of emissions inventory can significantly impact model results. If this is not feasible, please take the time to see how much emissions estimates vary in your study region using the FIRECAM tool.
  
:Do either of you know if I am looking at old files, and if what we have looks more like what he has? Or are we processing things 4 orders of magnitude too large?? Or, are we assuming a different unit on the emissions when we actually process them? I can't seem to find raw flambe data files anywhere besides Philippe's development directory...
+
--[[User:tianjialiu|Tianjia Liu]] ([[User talk:tianjialiu|talk]]) 15:30, 21 August 2019 (EDT)
  
'''''[mailto:plesager@seas.harvard.edu Philippe Le Sager] wrote:'''''
+
== Previous issues that are now resolved ==
  
:We had a couple of problems with the data. The one that gave me headache was the difference between forecast and analysis data, which can be mixed in some files. There was the issue of double counting fires seen by both GOES and MODIS, and we found a problem with unit.  It was Kg instead of g as advertised in the ppt [that was given to us] (the only documentation for the data).  Ed did correct the files and back processed the data on its server.
+
=== Fix bug in biomass burning emissions when GFED is turned off ===
  
:I have a "new" directory in my test data. You probably look at the old set of data. The new one is in the "new" subdirectory:
+
<span style="color:green">'''''This update was included in [[GEOS-Chem v11-02#v11-02f|v11-02f]] (approved 17 May 2018).'''''</span>
  
    /home/phs/IDL/dvpt/flambe/data/new/
+
'''''Corey Trujillo (U. Colorado) wrote:'''''
  
:You can also still get the data at the following website:
+
:I've been learning [[GEOS-Chem v11-01]] and have encountered two anomalies (one a bug, one a potential bug) when I turn off GFED.  These also appear to persist in v11-02d.
  
    http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/aerosol_web/arctas_flambe/data_hourly/
+
:The first issue is that the model defaults to using BOND biomass burning if GFED (or FINN) is off. This is a bit strange, especially since BOND biomass burning would then be turned on if a user turned off GFED and FINN but turned on QFED - this would lead to double biomass burning emissions for BC and OC. This can be avoided by defining a separate emission extension for BOND biomass burning in HEMCO_Config.rc, i.e. replacing this:
  
:Finally here are some totals we check w/ Maria and Jingqiu:
+
  (((.not.GFED.or.FINN
 +
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      BCPO 71    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      OCPO 73    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG1  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG1 74/76 2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG2  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG2 74/77 2 1
 +
  ))).not.GFED.or.FINN
  
    Data for one set of satellites was still given Kg.  Now fixed, I have the following
+
:with something like this:
    total for one day all over the world, assuming 3 land types. Seems reasonable, no?
+
+
    NOx (Tg N) assuming ALL is savanna / trop forest / extraTrop forest:
+
      0.080809369    0.063615890      0.10316091
+
+
    CO (Tg) assuming ALL is savanna / trop forest / extraTrop forest:
+
      4.6422410      7.5160097      7.8107557
+
+
    SMOKE (Tg) assuming ALL is savanna / trop forest / extraTrop forest:
+
      0.47039473      0.47039473      0.47039473
+
  
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 15:07, 18 February 2009 (EST)
+
  (((BOND_BBURN
 +
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      BCPO 71    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      OCPO 73    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG1  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG1 74/76 2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG2  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG2 74/77 2 1
 +
  )))BOND_BBURN
  
=== Obtaining the FLAMBE data ===
+
:The second issue is that if someone is to use the BOND biomass burning emissions, either intentionally or not, the emissions are not showing up in the BC-BIOB diagnostic. Instead, that diagnostic is all zeros, even though there is still clearly biomass burning emissions occurring in the model.  Figures demonstrating this for a one month simulation of the standard code for July 2013, 4x5, GEOSFP, can be found here.
  
==== Raw data ====
+
:There is thus a bug in the BC-BIOB diagnostic — has anyone else encountered this or have a suggestion for a fix?
The FLAMBE biomass burning data files are available at the following archive: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/aerosol_web/arctas_flambe/data_hourly/.
+
  
[[User:Bmy|Bob Yantosca]] has some scripts that can be used to download the data (contact him for more info).  These are:
+
'''''Therese Carter (MIT) wrote:'''''
  
;sleepFlambe: Perl script which issues a [[Downloading GEOS-Chem source code and data#Using wget to download files|Unix <tt>wget</tt>]] command to download one day (24 hourly files) of FLAMBE data to disk.
+
:A question came up recently about v11-01 defaulting to using BOND biomass burning emissions if QFED is switched on and both FINN and GFED are switched off. This can be fairly easily fixed by adding the following code in red:
;wrap_flambe.pro: IDL batch file which acts as a driver for looping over all 24 hours of FLAMBE data for a given date.
+
;read_flambe.pro: IDL program which reads each FLAMBE "raw" data file and saves it to [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/gamap/doc/Chapter_6.html#6.2 GEOS-Chem bpch format].
+
  
==== Processed data ====
+
  (((.not.GFED.or.FINN<span style="color:red">.or.QFED2</span>
The processed FLAMBE data (for input to GEOS-Chem) are kept on the Harvard data archive in the directories:
+
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      BCPO 71    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI  $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC  2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO  -                                        -    -            - -  -      OCPO 73    2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG1  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG1 74/76 2 1
 +
  0 BOND_BM_POG2  -                                        -    -            - -  -      POG2 74/77 2 1
 +
  ))).not.GFED.or.FINN<span style="color:red">.or.QFED2</span>
  
ftp ftp.as.harvard.edu
+
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Yantosca]] ([[User talk:Bmy|talk]]) 16:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
cd /pub/geos-chem/NRT-ARCTAS/flambe/YYYY/MM
+
 
+
where <tt>YYYY/MM</tt> are the year and month of the data.  Currently we have the full data archive from 2008 and 2009, with some months of 2010.
+
 
+
--[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 14:32, 10 February 2010 (EST)
+
 
+
== Duncan et al "Seasonal" Biomass Emissions ==
+
 
+
See ''Bey et al'' [2001].
+
 
+
== Duncan et al "Interannual" Biomass Emissions ==
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 93: Line 91:
 
#Mu, M., J.T. Randerson, G.R. van der Werf, L. Giglio, P. Kasibhatla, D. Morton, G.J. Collatz, R.S. DeFries,  E.J. Hyer, E.M. Prins, D.W.T. Griffith, D. Wunch, G.C. Toon, V. Sherlock, and P.O. Wennberg, ''Daily and 3-hourly variability in global fire emissions and consequences for atmospheric model predictions of carbon monoxide'', <u>Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres</u>, '''116''', D24303, doi:10.1029/2011JD016245, 2011.
 
#Mu, M., J.T. Randerson, G.R. van der Werf, L. Giglio, P. Kasibhatla, D. Morton, G.J. Collatz, R.S. DeFries,  E.J. Hyer, E.M. Prins, D.W.T. Griffith, D. Wunch, G.C. Toon, V. Sherlock, and P.O. Wennberg, ''Daily and 3-hourly variability in global fire emissions and consequences for atmospheric model predictions of carbon monoxide'', <u>Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres</u>, '''116''', D24303, doi:10.1029/2011JD016245, 2011.
 
#Nassar, R., J. A. Logan, I. A. Megretskaia, L. T. Murray, L. Zhang, and D. B. A. Jones, ''Analysis of tropical tropospheric ozone, carbon monoxide and water vapor during the 2006 El Niño using TES observations and the GEOS-Chem model'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''114''', D17304, doi:10.1029/2009JD011760, 2009. [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/publications/2009/nassar_2009.pdf PDF]
 
#Nassar, R., J. A. Logan, I. A. Megretskaia, L. T. Murray, L. Zhang, and D. B. A. Jones, ''Analysis of tropical tropospheric ozone, carbon monoxide and water vapor during the 2006 El Niño using TES observations and the GEOS-Chem model'', <u>J. Geophys. Res.</u>, '''114''', D17304, doi:10.1029/2009JD011760, 2009. [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/publications/2009/nassar_2009.pdf PDF]
#van der Werf, G., J.T. Randerson, L. Giglio, G.J. Collatz, M. Mu, P.S. Kasibhatla, D.C. Morton, R.S. DeFries, Y. Jin, and T. T. van Leeuwen, ''Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009)'', <u>Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.</u>, '''10''', 16153-16230, 2010. [http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/16153/2010/acpd-10-16153-2010.html PDF]
+
#Liu, T., L.J. Mickley, R.S. DeFries, M.E. Marlier, M.F. Khan, M.T. Latif, and A. Karambelas, ''Diagnosing spatial uncertainties and relative biases in global fire emissions inventories: Indonesia as regional case study'', <u>Remote Sens. Environ.</u>, '''237''', 111557. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111557 Article]
 +
#van der Werf, G. R., J. T. Randerson, L. Giglio, T. T. van Leeuwen, Y. Chen, B. M. Rogers, M. Mu, M. J. E. van Marle, D. C. Morton, G. J. Collatz, R. J. Yokelson, and P. S. Kasibhatla, ''Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016'', <u>Earth Sys. Sci. Data</u>, '''9''', 697-720, 2017. [https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017 Article]
 +
#Wiedinmyer, C., S.K. Akagi, R.J. Yokelson, L.K. Emmons, J.J. Orlando, and A.J. Soja, ''The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning'', <u>Geosci. Model Dev.</u>, '''4''', 625–641, 2011. [https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011 Article]
 +
#Kaiser, J.W., A. Heil, M.O. Andreae, A. Benedetti, N. Chubarova, L. Jones, J.J. Morcrette, M. Razinger, M.G. Schultz, M. Suttie, and G.R. van der Werf, ''Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power'', <u>Biogeosciences</u>, '''9''', 527–554, 2012. [https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012 Article]
 +
#Darmenov, A.S. and A. da Silva, ''The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED) - Documentation of versions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4, NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Volume 32'', 2013. [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.406.7724 Article]
 +
#Ichoku, C. and L. Ellison, ''Global top-down smoke-aerosol emissions estimation using satellite fire radiative power measurements'', <u>Atmos. Chem. Phys.</u>, '''14''', 6643–6667, 2014. [https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6643-2014 Article]
  
 
--[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Payer]] 15:10, 21 February 2012 (EST)
 
--[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Payer]] 15:10, 21 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 07:30, 12 December 2019

This page describes the options for biomass burning emissions in GEOS-Chem.

GFED4

The GFED4 biomass burning emission inventory is now the current default biomass burning dataset for GEOS-Chem (introduced in v10-01, June 2015). The current GFED4 archive contains data from 1997 through 2016.

GFED4 has since superseded the obsolete GFED3 and GFED2 inventories.

--Bob Yantosca (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

FINNv1

The FINNv1 biomass burning emission inventory has been added to GEOS-Chem v10-01 via the HEMCO emissions component. This inventory may be used to replace GFED4 for research purposes.

--Melissa Sulprizio 10:21, 18 February 2015 (EST)

QFED

The QFED biomass burning emission inventory has been added to GEOS-Chem v10-01 via the HEMCO emissions component. This inventory may be used to replace GFED4 for research purposes.

--Melissa Sulprizio (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

GFAS

The GFAS biomass burning emission inventory was added in GEOS-Chem 12.2.0 via the HEMCO emissions component. This inventory may be used to replace GFED4 for research purposes.

--Melissa Sulprizio (talk) 12:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

FIRECAM tool

I developed the FIRECAM tool for end-users to quickly compare fire emissions estimates from five global inventories (GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2, FINNv1.5, QFEDv2.5r1, and FEERv1.0-G1.2) for a given study region. Currently, FIRECAM supports six species: CO2, CO, CH4, OC, BC, and PM2.5. FIRECAM compares the five inventories at an aggregated 0.5deg x 0.5deg spatial resolution for the 2003-2018 time period. Please see the FIRECAM website and our paper for more information. The paper describes the methodological differences among these inventories and metrics we developed to diagnose spatial biases and uncertainties. We recommend end-users to use multiple inventories in model runs, if possible. As we show in our paper, the choice of emissions inventory can significantly impact model results. If this is not feasible, please take the time to see how much emissions estimates vary in your study region using the FIRECAM tool.

--Tianjia Liu (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2019 (EDT)

Previous issues that are now resolved

Fix bug in biomass burning emissions when GFED is turned off

This update was included in v11-02f (approved 17 May 2018).

Corey Trujillo (U. Colorado) wrote:

I've been learning GEOS-Chem v11-01 and have encountered two anomalies (one a bug, one a potential bug) when I turn off GFED. These also appear to persist in v11-02d.
The first issue is that the model defaults to using BOND biomass burning if GFED (or FINN) is off. This is a bit strange, especially since BOND biomass burning would then be turned on if a user turned off GFED and FINN but turned on QFED - this would lead to double biomass burning emissions for BC and OC. This can be avoided by defining a separate emission extension for BOND biomass burning in HEMCO_Config.rc, i.e. replacing this:
  (((.not.GFED.or.FINN
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       BCPO 71    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       OCPO 73    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG1   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG1 74/76 2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG2   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG2 74/77 2 1
  ))).not.GFED.or.FINN
with something like this:
  (((BOND_BBURN
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       BCPO 71    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       OCPO 73    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG1   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG1 74/76 2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG2   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG2 74/77 2 1
  )))BOND_BBURN
The second issue is that if someone is to use the BOND biomass burning emissions, either intentionally or not, the emissions are not showing up in the BC-BIOB diagnostic. Instead, that diagnostic is all zeros, even though there is still clearly biomass burning emissions occurring in the model. Figures demonstrating this for a one month simulation of the standard code for July 2013, 4x5, GEOSFP, can be found here.
There is thus a bug in the BC-BIOB diagnostic — has anyone else encountered this or have a suggestion for a fix?

Therese Carter (MIT) wrote:

A question came up recently about v11-01 defaulting to using BOND biomass burning emissions if QFED is switched on and both FINN and GFED are switched off. This can be fairly easily fixed by adding the following code in red:
  (((.not.GFED.or.FINN.or.QFED2
  0 BOND_BM_BCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc BC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s BCPI 70    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_BCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       BCPO 71    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPI   $ROOT/BCOC_BOND/v2014-07/Bond_biomass.nc OC   2000/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s OCPI 72    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_OCPO   -                                        -    -             - -  -       OCPO 73    2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG1   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG1 74/76 2 1
  0 BOND_BM_POG2   -                                        -    -             - -  -       POG2 74/77 2 1
  ))).not.GFED.or.FINN.or.QFED2

--Bob Yantosca (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. Duncan, B.N., et al., Interannual and Seasonal Variability of Biomass Burning Emissions Constrained by Satellite Observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 4040, doi:10.1029/2002JD002378, 2003. PDF
  2. Hyer, E., FLAMBE Biomass Burning emissions for ARCTAS, 2008. PDF
  3. Lobert, J. M., W. C. Keene, J. A. Logan, and R. Yevich, Global chlorine emissions from biomass burning: the reactive chlorine emissions inventory, J. Geophys. Res., 8, 2999-3014, 2008.
  4. Mu, M., J.T. Randerson, G.R. van der Werf, L. Giglio, P. Kasibhatla, D. Morton, G.J. Collatz, R.S. DeFries, E.J. Hyer, E.M. Prins, D.W.T. Griffith, D. Wunch, G.C. Toon, V. Sherlock, and P.O. Wennberg, Daily and 3-hourly variability in global fire emissions and consequences for atmospheric model predictions of carbon monoxide, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 116, D24303, doi:10.1029/2011JD016245, 2011.
  5. Nassar, R., J. A. Logan, I. A. Megretskaia, L. T. Murray, L. Zhang, and D. B. A. Jones, Analysis of tropical tropospheric ozone, carbon monoxide and water vapor during the 2006 El Niño using TES observations and the GEOS-Chem model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D17304, doi:10.1029/2009JD011760, 2009. PDF
  6. Liu, T., L.J. Mickley, R.S. DeFries, M.E. Marlier, M.F. Khan, M.T. Latif, and A. Karambelas, Diagnosing spatial uncertainties and relative biases in global fire emissions inventories: Indonesia as regional case study, Remote Sens. Environ., 237, 111557. Article
  7. van der Werf, G. R., J. T. Randerson, L. Giglio, T. T. van Leeuwen, Y. Chen, B. M. Rogers, M. Mu, M. J. E. van Marle, D. C. Morton, G. J. Collatz, R. J. Yokelson, and P. S. Kasibhatla, Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Sys. Sci. Data, 9, 697-720, 2017. Article
  8. Wiedinmyer, C., S.K. Akagi, R.J. Yokelson, L.K. Emmons, J.J. Orlando, and A.J. Soja, The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, 2011. Article
  9. Kaiser, J.W., A. Heil, M.O. Andreae, A. Benedetti, N. Chubarova, L. Jones, J.J. Morcrette, M. Razinger, M.G. Schultz, M. Suttie, and G.R. van der Werf, Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences, 9, 527–554, 2012. Article
  10. Darmenov, A.S. and A. da Silva, The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED) - Documentation of versions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4, NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Volume 32, 2013. Article
  11. Ichoku, C. and L. Ellison, Global top-down smoke-aerosol emissions estimation using satellite fire radiative power measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6643–6667, 2014. Article

--Melissa Payer 15:10, 21 February 2012 (EST)