|
|
(44 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | __FORCETOC__ |
| | '''''[[Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms|Previous]] | [[CH4 simulation|Next]] | [[Guide to GEOS-Chem simulations]]''''' |
| | #[[Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms|Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms (carbon, fullchem, Hg)]] |
| | #<span style="color:blue">'''Aerosol-only simulation'''</span> |
| | #[[CH4 simulation]] |
| | #[[CO2 simulation]] |
| | #[[Metals simulation]] |
| | #[[POPs simulation]] |
| | #[[Tagged CO simulation]] |
| | #[[Tagged O3 simulation]] |
| | #[[TransportTracers simulation]] |
| | |
| | |
| On this page we describe the aerosol-only (a.k.a. offline aerosol) simulation. | | On this page we describe the aerosol-only (a.k.a. offline aerosol) simulation. |
|
| |
|
Line 4: |
Line 17: |
| The aerosol simulation is an offline simulation for aerosol tracers only. It uses archived monthly mean OH, NO3, O3 and total nitrate concentrations archived from a previous full-chemistry simulation (more on that below), as well as production and loss rates for H2O2. This simulation does not provide "tagged" capabilities, but reduces the suite of tracers from full chemistry. | | The aerosol simulation is an offline simulation for aerosol tracers only. It uses archived monthly mean OH, NO3, O3 and total nitrate concentrations archived from a previous full-chemistry simulation (more on that below), as well as production and loss rates for H2O2. This simulation does not provide "tagged" capabilities, but reduces the suite of tracers from full chemistry. |
|
| |
|
| == Assumptions ==
| | NOTES: |
| # OH concentrations are taken from a previously run full chemistry simulation. The default is from a much earlier version of the model, when OH thought to be more realistic. The standard code uses OH from version 5-07-08, with GEOS3 meteorology. | | # The aerosol-only simuation is currently functional in GEOS-Chem Classic. |
| # O3, NO3 and total nitrate (HNO3+NIT) concentrations, as well as production rates and photolysis rates for H2O2 are taken from a previously run full chemistry simulation. The current default fields were produced from a GEOS-4, v7-02-03 simulation. These files are generally located in the sulfate_sim_200508/offline/ directory in your GEOS-Chem data directories. | | # There is currently no aerosol-only run directory for GCHP. Interested users are encouraged to make this modification on their own. |
| | # OH concentrations are archived from the most recent 10-year benchmark simulation. |
| | # O3, NO3 and total nitrate (HNO3+NIT) concentrations, as well as production rates and photolysis rates for H2O2 are archived from the most recent 10-year benchmark simulation. |
|
| |
|
| == Practicalities == | | == Practicalities == |
|
| |
|
| As with all other [[Offline chemistry simulations]], the [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/geos_people.html GEOS-Chem user community] shall be responsible for the scientific content and validation of the aerosol-only simulation. | | As with all other specialty simulations, the [https://geoschem.github.io/geos-chem-people-projects-map/ GEOS-Chem user community] shall be responsible for the scientific content and validation of the aerosol-only simulation. |
|
| |
|
| === Tracer list ===
| | The SOA simulation was updated in [[GEOS-Chem_v9-02_benchmark_history#v9-02o|GEOS-Chem v9-02o]] to include a better tracer lumping scheme, as shown in Figure 1 of [http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/11261/2010/acp-10-11261-2010.pdf Pye et al. 2010]. |
| | |
| ==== GEOS-Chem v9-01-03 and earlier versions ====
| |
| | |
| In [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-03]] and earlier versions, there are 31 tracers in a complete aerosol-only simulation (see input.geos below).
| |
| | |
| The offline aerosol is simulation type 10. For a full set of aerosol tracers (based on the 59-tracer full-chemistry SOA simulation), the input.geos should look like this:
| |
| | |
| Type of simulation : 10
| |
| Number of Tracers : 31
| |
| Tracer Entries -------> : TR# Name g/mole Tracer Members; () = emitted
| |
| Tracer #1 : 1 DMS 62.00
| |
| Tracer #2 : 2 SO2 64.00
| |
| Tracer #3 : 3 SO4 96.00
| |
| Tracer #4 : 4 MSA 96.00
| |
| Tracer #5 : 5 NH3 17.00
| |
| Tracer #6 : 6 NH4 18.00
| |
| Tracer #7 : 7 NIT 62.00
| |
| Tracer #8 : 8 H2O2 34.00
| |
| Tracer #9 : 9 BCPI 12.00
| |
| Tracer #10 : 10 OCPI 12.00
| |
| Tracer #11 : 11 BCPO 12.00
| |
| Tracer #12 : 12 OCPO 12.00
| |
| Tracer #13 : 13 ALPH 136.23
| |
| Tracer #14 : 14 LIMO 136.23
| |
| Tracer #15 : 15 ALCO 142.00
| |
| Tracer #16 : 16 SOG1 150.00
| |
| Tracer #17 : 17 SOG2 160.00
| |
| Tracer #18 : 18 SOG3 220.00
| |
| Tracer #19 : 19 SOG4 130.00
| |
| Tracer #20 : 20 SOG5 150.00
| |
| Tracer #21 : 21 SOA1 150.00
| |
| Tracer #22 : 22 SOA2 160.00
| |
| Tracer #23 : 23 SOA3 220.00
| |
| Tracer #24 : 24 SOA4 130.00
| |
| Tracer #25 : 25 SOA5 150.00
| |
| Tracer #26 : 26 DST1 29.00
| |
| Tracer #27 : 27 DST2 29.00
| |
| Tracer #28 : 28 DST3 29.00
| |
| Tracer #29 : 29 DST4 29.00
| |
| Tracer #30 : 30 SALA 36.00
| |
| Tracer #31 : 31 SALC 36.00
| |
| | |
| This list can be reduced by turning off any aerosol species (eg. SOA, dust, SS, etc). You may also run without the secondary organic aerosols (ALPH, LIMO, ALCO, SOG{1,2,3,4,5}, SOA{1,2,3,4,5}) if you wish (but we recommend that you use them).
| |
| | |
| ==== GEOS-Chem v9-02 and later versions ====
| |
| | |
| The [[Secondary_organic_aerosols#SOA_simulation_with_semi-volatile_POA|SOA simulation]] was updated in [[GEOS-Chem_v9-02_benchmark_history#v9-02o|GEOS-Chem v9-02o]] to include a better tracer lumping scheme, as shown in Figure 1 of [http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/11261/2010/acp-10-11261-2010.pdf Pye et al. 2010]. | |
|
| |
|
| The offline aerosol is simulation type 10. For a full set of aerosol tracers (based on the 100-tracer full-chemistry SOA simulation), the input.geos should look like this: | | The offline aerosol is simulation type 10. For a full set of aerosol tracers (based on the 100-tracer full-chemistry SOA simulation), the input.geos should look like this: |
Line 116: |
Line 84: |
| This list can be reduced by turning off any aerosol species (eg. SOA, dust, SS, etc). You may also run without the secondary organic aerosols (MTPA, LIMO, MTPO, TSOG0–3, TSOA0–3, ISOG1–3, ISOA1–3, ASOG1–3, ASOA1–3, ASOAN) if you wish (but we recommend that you use them). | | This list can be reduced by turning off any aerosol species (eg. SOA, dust, SS, etc). You may also run without the secondary organic aerosols (MTPA, LIMO, MTPO, TSOG0–3, TSOA0–3, ISOG1–3, ISOA1–3, ASOG1–3, ASOA1–3, ASOAN) if you wish (but we recommend that you use them). |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Sulprizio]] 12:51, 5 November 2013 (EST) | | ---- |
| | | '''''[[Simulations using KPP-built mechanisms|Previous]] | [[CH4 simulation|Next]] | [[Guide to GEOS-Chem simulations]]''''' |
| == More Information ==
| |
| For more information, see the GEOS-Chem manual pages about offline aerosols:
| |
| [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/doc/man/chapter_6.html#Aerosols http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/doc/man/chapter_6.html#6.1.6]
| |
| [http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/doc/man/appendix_1.html#Aerosols http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/doc/man/appendix_1.html#A1.2]
| |
| | |
| == Previous issues that have now been resolved ==
| |
| | |
| === Fixed undefined molecular weight of HNO3 in routine SEASALT_CHEM ===
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:green">'''''This fix was included in [[GEOS-Chem v11-01 benchmark history#v11-01j|v11-01j]] and approved on 03 Dec 2016'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| In routine <code>SEASALT_CHEM</code> (in <code>GeosCore/sulfate_mod.F</code>), the <code>MW_HNO3</code> variable was undefined for aerosol-only simulations, which do not use HNO3 as a defined species. This issue was detected by a unit test using the [[GNU Fortran compiler]].
| |
| | |
| To fix this issue, we have added the following block of code, which defines <code>MW_HNO3</code> whether or not HNO3 is a defined species:
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:green">! Get the molecular weight of HNO3 from the species database
| |
| ! if it is defined, otherwise set it manually (bmy, 10/11/16)
| |
| IF ( id_HNO3 > 0 ) THEN
| |
| MW_HNO3 = State_Chm%SpcData(id_HNO3)%Info%emMW_g
| |
| ELSE
| |
| MW_HNO3 = 63.0_fp
| |
| ENDIF</span>
| |
| | |
| NOTE: This is just a quick fix. Ideally, we will want to declare HNO3 as a non-advected species in the [[GEOS-Chem species database]] for these simulationns.
| |
| | |
| --[[User:Bmy|Bob Yantosca]] ([[User talk:Bmy|talk]]) 16:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Error in ISOROPIAII when sulfate aerosols are turned off ===
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:green">'''''This update was tested in the 1-month benchmark simulation [[GEOS-Chem v9-02 benchmark history#1-month benchmark with GEOS-5 meteorology|v9-02r]] and approved on 14 Nov 2013.'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| '''''[mailto:cbuten@pdx.edu Chris Butenhoff] wrote:'''''
| |
| | |
| :I set ONLINE SULFATE AEROSOLS = F and removed the sulfate aerosols from the tracer list. However I now get the error "IDTSO4 is undefined" from <tt>isoropia11_mod.F</tt> (line 207).
| |
| | |
| For full-chemistry simulations, we only call routine <tt>DO_ISOROPIAII</tt> if sulfate aerosols are used (i.e. LSULF = T). However, no such check exists when running the offline aerosol simulation. This was probably an oversight and we should add the following fix to routine <tt>DO_CHEMISTRY</tt> (in <tt>GeosCore/chemistry_mod.F</tt>):
| |
| | |
| !*** AEROSOL THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM ***
| |
| '''IF ( LSULF ) THEN'''
| |
| IF ( LSSALT ) THEN
| |
|
| |
| #if !defined( NO_ISORROPIA )
| |
| ! ISOROPIA takes Na+, Cl- into account
| |
| CALL DO_ISOROPIAII
| |
| & ( am_I_Root, Input_Opt, State_Met, State_Chm, RC )
| |
| #endif
| |
|
| |
| ELSE
| |
|
| |
| ! RPMARES does not take Na+, Cl- into account
| |
| ! (skip for crystalline & aqueous offline run)
| |
| IF ( .not. LCRYST ) THEN
| |
| CALL DO_RPMARES( am_I_Root, Input_Opt,
| |
| & State_Met, State_Chm, RC )
| |
| ENDIF
| |
| ENDIF
| |
| '''ENDIF'''
| |
| | |
| --[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 15:29, 14 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| | |
| === Bug in routine GET_WETDEP_NMAX when using SOA ===
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:green">'''''This issue was resolved in [[GEOS-Chem v9-02]].'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| The following issue exists in [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-03]] and earlier versions.
| |
| | |
| '''''[mailto:cbuten@pdx.edu Chris Butenhoff] wrote:'''''
| |
| | |
| :There appears to be a bug in <tt>wetscav_mod.F</tt>. In line 6978 the number of carbon + SOA aerosols in the tracer list should be 17 not 15. This is set correctly for the fullchem simulation but not offline simulations.
| |
| | |
| The corrected code is shown below:
| |
| | |
| ELSE IF ( ITS_AN_AEROSOL_SIM() ) THEN
| |
|
| |
| !-----------------------
| |
| ! Offline simulation
| |
| !-----------------------
| |
| NMAX = 0
| |
| IF ( LSULF ) NMAX = NMAX + 9 ! add 9 sulfur species
| |
| IF ( LCRYST ) NMAX = NMAX + 5 ! add 5 cryst & aq species
| |
| IF ( LDUST ) NMAX = NMAX + NDSTBIN ! Add number of dust bins
| |
| IF ( LSSALT ) NMAX = NMAX + 2 ! plus 2 seasalts
| |
|
| |
| IF ( LSOA ) THEN
| |
| IF ( LCARB ) NMAX = NMAX + '''17''' ! carbon + SOA aerosols
| |
| ELSE
| |
| IF ( LCARB ) NMAX = NMAX + 4 ! just carbon aerosols
| |
| ENDIF
| |
| | |
| --[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Sulprizio]] 11:17, 5 November 2013 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == Known issues ==
| |
| | |
| === ND05 diagnostic quantities zeroed unexpectedly ===
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:red">'''''In [[GEOS-Chem v11-01]], we shall be implementing netCDF-based diagnostics. These will render the "binary punch" format diagnostics obsolete.'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| '''''Helen McIntyre wrote:'''''
| |
| :I'm running the new and old versions of GEOS-Chem, and both seem to not output all the ND05 diagnostics correctly. There are 10 prod/loss diagnostics in this category, but only the 5th, 6th and 7th work. All the rest come out as zero.
| |
| | |
| :I've had a brief look though the code, and it seems that the ones that work are calculated in one part of the routine (<tt>sulfate_mod.f</tt>), and the zero ones in another (I don't know if this has anything to do with it).
| |
| | |
| :I've just done a 1 day run, with [[GEOS-Chem v8-01-01]] at 4x5 resolution using GEOS-5 met fields. The old version I'm using is v7-02-04 and I get the same result.
| |
| | |
| :The 'ctm.bpch', 'geos.log' and 'input.geos' files from the v8-01-01 run can be found here: http://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~lechlm/files/
| |
| | |
| '''''Claire Carouge replied:'''''
| |
| | |
| :There are some problems in the calculations. For the 5th element of AD05 (in Fortran notations and not IDL), the diagnostic come from the value of L1 which is calculated line 1529 (v8-01-04):
| |
| | |
| L1 = ( SO20 - SO2_cd + PSO2_DMS(I,J,L) ) * RK1/RK
| |
| | |
| :But on line 1508, we have:
| |
| | |
| RK1 = 0.d0
| |
| | |
| :with the previous comment:
| |
| | |
| ! For online runs, SMVGEAR deals w/ this computation,
| |
| ! so we can simply set RK1 = 0 (rjp, bmy, 3/23/03)
| |
| | |
| :So L1 is always 0. I have no idea what RK1 is for, you may have to go into the physics/chemistry behind the code and we are not qualified to help you with it.
| |
| | |
| :The other values for AD05 are calculated in the routine CHEM_DMS and this routine is only called in an offline aerosol simulation (l. 545 in <tt>sulfate_mod.f</tt>).
| |
| | |
| :So my guess is that the ND05 diagnostic was designed for offline simulations and if you want it for online chemistry, you need to implement it.
| |
| | |
| == Obsolete information ==
| |
| | |
| The following sections pertain to code that has since been removed from the most recent GEOS-Chem versions. We shall leave this information here for reference.
| |
| | |
| === Bugs in reading EMEP and EPA-NEI data from disk ===
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Obsolete.jpg]]
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:red">'''''In [[GEOS-Chem v10-01]] and higher versions, EMEP and EPA/NEI emissions are handled by the [[HEMCO|HEMCO emissions component]].'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| The following issues exist in [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-01]] and higher versions. These issues were resolved in [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-03]].
| |
| | |
| # [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-02#Fixes in emep_mod.f|Minor issue in <tt>emep_mod.f</tt> affecting the offline aerosol simulation]]
| |
| # [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-02#Fix for offline simulations in nei2005_anthro_mod.f|Minor issue in <tt>nei2005_anthro_mod.f</tt> affecting the offline aerosol simulation]]
| |
| | |
| --[[User:Bmy|Bob Y.]] 11:48, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| === Emissions not included when using non-local PBL mixing scheme ===
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Obsolete.jpg]]
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:red">'''''This code was removed from [[GEOS-Chem v10-01]] and newer versions. All emissions are now implemented via the [[HEMCO|HEMCO emissions component]].'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:green">'''''This update was tested in the 1-month benchmark simulation [[GEOS-Chem_v9-02_benchmark_history#v9-02l|v9-02l]] and approved on 26 Jun 2013.'''''</span>
| |
| | |
| It was discovered in [[GEOS-Chem v9-01-03]] that the emissions were not being added into tracer concentration when the non-local PBL scheme was turned on in input.geos. To solve this problem, the following code needs to be added to routine VDIFFDR (vdiff_mod.F90) in the same loop where emissions are added for the full-chemistry simulation:
| |
| | |
| !----------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| ! Add emissions for offline aerosol simulation
| |
| !----------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| IF ( IS_AEROSOL ) THEN
| |
|
| |
| ! add surface emis of aerosols
| |
| ! (after converting kg/box/timestep to kg/m2/s)
| |
| ! Should NOT use ID_EMITTED here, since it is only for gases
| |
| ! for SMVGEAR. (Lin, 06/10/08)
| |
| do N = 1, N_TRACERS
| |
| eflx(I,J,N) = eflx(I,J,N) + emis_save(I,J,N) &
| |
| / GET_AREA_M2( I, J, 1 ) &
| |
| / GET_TS_EMIS() / 60.d0
| |
| enddo
| |
|
| |
| ENDIF
| |
| | |
| At the top of the same routine, <tt>IS_AEROSOL</tt> needs to be defined as:
| |
| | |
| LOGICAL :: IS_AEROSOL
| |
|
| |
| IS_AEROSOL = ITS_AN_AEROSOL_SIM()
| |
| | |
| --[[User:Melissa Payer|Melissa Payer]] 12:01, 19 June 2013 (EDT)
| |